LEAN Blog CommentInsight, opinion and commentary for the leaders of Lean Enterprise Transformation from some of the world's leading experts.

 


Lesson learned…again.

March 4th, 2007 - by Mark Edmondson

Here’s a lesson I learned…again…about how to talk about process thinking and TPS with non-manufacturing people. Last week I visited an organization whose primary output is events (conferences, seminars, workshops) and publications (books, journals, articles – not the physical product, but the content – the intellectual capital and ideas).

They shared that their organization is over 50 years old, yet they have never formally reviewed their business processes. Like many companies, when there was a new product, service or regulation, the teams put together the process to deliver or comply. This was usually done at a department level, so several departments often created their piece of the process on their own. And there was no practice to review the effectiveness of this process over time.

Message I got loud and clear: They really need some help.

They then asked me how lean thinking could help. And although I thought I had a short, eloquent answer, I made a near fatal mistake: I mentioned that many of the roots of lean come from the Toyota Production System. That’s a fact, but I’ve leaned a lesson: I need to be more conscious about sharing this fact too soon.

Because mentioning lean’s manufacturing roots invariably brings up the question of how can a manufacturing business model possibly apply to their service company with mostly knowledge workers?

And because mentioning lean’s manufacturing roots usually hijacks the conversation from talking about their business (productive conversation) to a lot of time spent handling their concern about using a manufacturing based methodology (less productive conversation).

Lesson learned: For non-manufacturing organizations, talk less about the origins of the methodology and more about how you can help the business.

One Response to “Lesson learned…again.”

  1. Mark Graban Says:

    I have mixed feelings about that. I think to gloss over the role of Toyota disrespects their contribution and sharing a bit. Part of me thinks “if they can’t handle that Toyota contributed a lot to these ideas, then these are probably concrete heads who aren’t open to new ideas.” Part of me understands the desire to keep it focused on THEIR business.

    I just started with a new client today and I certainly mentioned Toyota’s role… but immediately followed it with caveats about how many industries (manufacturing and beyond) have used lean with success, and so have hospitals. I made sure to point out that we’re not copying Toyota, but taking high level principles from Toyota that we will learn from and adapt for OUR location and OUR business. That seems to work fine for me, so I haven’t had to avoid the Toyota angle.

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image

Executive Lean Education Executive Coaching Strategy Execution & Policy Deployment Lean Accounting Value Stream Transformation Product Development and Launch Supply Chain & Logistics Lean Thinking for Knowledge Workers Developing People Idea Generation System Professional Workflow Managing Resistance to Change